What I found when reading "Taken into Custody: The War Against Fatherhood, Marriage, and the Family"

I've mentioned Stephen Baskerville before, but only recently began reading his book Taken into Custody: The War Against Fatherhood, Marriage, and the Family. The book pointed me in the direction of a rather crazy case. I've excerpted the first paragraph of an article about the case below (which also supplies references to the actual court decisions):

During her divorce proceedings, Bonnie repeatedly claimed that Doug Richardson was the father of her child, but the child told Doug that Bonnie stated that Abraham Flores was his real father. The court refused Doug's request for a continuance to obtain counsel to assist in contesting paternity. The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed. A paternity test excluded Doug as a possible father of the child. Bonnie resumed living with Abraham, but Doug was forced to pay child support into the household of the child's real father. Later, Bonnie and Abraham broke up with a formal change of custody from Bonnie to Abraham. The Michigan State Court ordered Doug, the nonfather, to pay child support directly to Abraham, the biological father.

Source: Equal Justice Foundation