Our "wonderful" Canadian "justice" system

A man serving a life sentence for raping, killing and torching a 15-year-old Ontario girl while he was on mandatory supervision for one of Manitoba's most shocking sex crimes has won damages from the Canadian government after a prison official laughed at him for cutting his thumb.

Muri Peace Chilton, who was described as an incurable killer under his birth name of Murray Allan Gartton, said the injured thumb was "the most painful experience of his life," and called the laughter that followed "beyond callousness" and damaging because he "felt utterly humiliated."

After a six-year journey through the Federal Court of Canada, Chilton was awarded $2,500 in damages this month.

(From the National Post)

What do you expect the economy to be like in 10-20 years?

One of the things that inspired me to go travelling this year was, believe it or not, pessimism about the future. Looking at my investment options, they seemed basically an assortment of ways in which to lose money. Savings accounts and bonds generally seem to give a rate of return somewhat lower than the rate of inflation. Going into the riskier area of the mutual funds and stocks, well... just read the papers. Being still a student I have comparatively little invested there. Yet if I calculate my loss-on-investment I think that I've lost about $2000 or so, before taking into account additional losses due to inflation. Do I see a bright-looking future? Not so much. To quote William Robson of the C.D. Howe Foundation on Canada's economic future:
But we're only in good shape compared with other people's disasters.... It's not that very far away when the demands go up very sharply as the Baby Boomers start to retire in force. (cited in the Financial Post)
By and large, this isn't something that governments have accounted for. For example, the U.S. public debt is commonly cited at the seemingly outrageous figure of about $10 trillion. However, as the U.S. government's own figures show, once you take into account promises of medicare and social security funding versus future income projections, you end up with a figure closer to $53 trillion - over $450,000 per U.S. household. (The image to the right comes from an ad campaign in the New York Times by the Peterson Foundation - headed by a former U.S. Commerce Secretary). As Philip Longman noted in his book (p. 21-2):
As the cost of supporting the elderly has risen, governments have already responded by raising taxes on younger workers, and will be compelled to do so much more in the future. Younger workers, finding that not only does the economy require them to have far higher levels of education than did their parents, but that they must also pay far higher payroll taxes, are less able to afford children, and so have fewer of them, causing a new cycle of population aging.

What should you expect in a shrinking population? The experiences of a country like Japan (and common sense) seem to dictate that it will shrink. How much use is there in saving for retirement? Well, if money is simply a means of paying for services, then if the percentage of the population able to work is small, then I'd expect rampant wage inflation. I'm not happy about the idea, but I still expect that in years to come you'll see governments moving more and more along the lines of P.D. James' Children of Men - basically increased government sanction of suicide and perhaps even encouragement for the aged to follow this route.

By and large, I think that global warming is at worst a relatively minor concern compared with the changes in population profile.

What do you think? Am I too cynical?

For the book-nerd in you to drool over

Believe it or not the above is actually someone's personal library. Wired recently published an article with more photographic goodness and a little information on its contents. It includes such goodies as a hand-painted atlas from 1660 (with the first non-geo-centric maps of the solar system), an instruction model for the Saturn V rocket, and furnishings from a Bond movie. Of course that's only getting started.

Not quite as cool - yet still interesting - is the bibliochaise.

More "human rights" tribunal sillyness

Can the following decision by the BC Human Rights Tribunal be translated as anything other than "but they had money and lawyers and publicity this time"?

It ruled that the article, an excerpt from Mr. Steyn's book America Alone, contained historical, religious and factual inaccuracies, relied on common Muslim stereotypes and tried to "rally public opinion by exaggeration and causing the reader to fear Muslims."

"But fear is not synonymous with hatred and contempt," the tribunal wrote. "With all its inaccuracies and hyperbole, [the article] has resulted in political debate which, in our view, [B. C.'s hate speech human rights law] was never intended to suppress.

(From the National Post)

What makes the whole incident even more farcical are on the on-camera comments of the head of the organization which launched the complaint.

Pages

Subscribe to Rotundus.com RSS