How neutral is Google?

Ever thought about whether or not it's possible to build an unbiased search engine? There's a lot out there about Google's political leanings that most are probably not aware of:

"Google's sale of adult-content ads is part of a larger set of idiosyncratic standards. These choices offer a window into the Don't Be Evil philosophy and values of Google's founders, especially Sergey Brin, who has the power to decide what kinds of ads the search engine will accept or reject. The ad policies themselves generally reflect the personal preferences of Google's founders..."

- Excerpted from The Google Story: For Google's 10th Anniversary, p. 166

To give one example of a particular policy stance, it took a lawsuit to get Google to run pro-life ads. As well, if you look at the political profile of the average Googler, it's not exactly the most non-partisan company. 98% of political contributions by Googlers have gone to the democrats.

It's clear to me that the Google, as an organization, has certain leanings. Why it accepts ads for wine but not beer I don't really know.

People aren't good at being unbiased, although perhaps computers may be better. Since Google started out as an academic project, some details of how its search engine works are available.

I'm unsure that Google the search engine shares the company biases. That said, the ads accompanying search results are likely to tilt people in a desired direction.

What do you think?

The paradox of choice... an oddly theological book

Lately I've been trying to cut back on costs, and one of the ways that I've been working on this is to *gasp* actually try to read all the books already on my bookshelves. (What a crazy idea!)

One of those recently finished was the Paradox of Choice. The author doesn't appear to be Christian, considering for example his comments on religious consumerism. Yet the book seems oddly, or perhaps not so oddly, heavily theological. Take this quotation from p. 235 for example:

11. Learn to love constraints

As the number of choices we face increases, freedom of choice eventually becomes a tyranny of choice. Routines decisions take so much time and attention that it becomes difficult to get through the day. In circumstances like this, we should learn to view limits on the possibilities we faces as liberating not constraining.

Compare to, e.g., Ps. 119:165 (ESV):

Great peace have those who love your law;
nothing can make them stumble.

Automotive fuel efficiency standards by country

It's amazing how much noise American manufacturers put out about fuel efficiency standards and how impossible they are to meet. Also interesting to see how this compares to the rest of the world.

China: 43 mpg.
Canada: 27 mpg
(current average, no standard)
TBA (starting in 2011)
United States: 25 mpg.
(current average)
35 mpg. (proposed, 2030
California: 25 mpg. (current)
36 mpg. (proposed, 2016)
Europe: 40 mpg. (current)
48.9 mpg. (proposed 2012)
Japan: 40 mpg. (current)
48.9 mpg. (proposed, 2015)

Source: Toronto Star

Food and theology

It was interesting to note that the US Humane Society threw together a video with an argument along essentially theological lines. It's not so much a don't-eat-animals video, but rather argues for good treatment of animals being part of good stewardship of the earth. A bit of an indictment of factory farms...

HT: Space for God

Pages

Subscribe to Rotundus.com RSS