Cynicism about marriage and family: responding to a comment on spousal abuse.

(This was originally posted as a response to Dan's comment, but I figured that I'd repost it as a story to prevent it from getting hidden)

I agree that spousal abuse is disturbing, but this issue can also be tossed in as another of the reasons that men might be cynical about marriage.

The president of the American Psychological Association published an article in 2006 entitled Psychological science is not politically correct. He notes:

Several studies of domestic violence have suggested that males and females in relationships have an equal likelihood of acting out physical aggression, although differing in tactics and potential for causing injury (e.g., women assailants will more likely throw something, slap, kick, bite, or punch their partner, or hit them with an object, while males will more likely beat up their partners, and choke or strangle them).

Take a look at the updated version of a 2004 journal paper. The abstract of the paper:

This bibliography examines 219 scholarly investigations: 170 empirical studies and 49 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 221,300.

Yet, there are shelters for battered, abused women but no equivalent for men to head to in such instances. In addition, women are able to initiate divorce in such instances.

(You could also examine the "female sentencing discount" when wives kill husbands as opposed to the other way around, but that's still another story)

Cynicism about marriage and family (Part 2): a recipe for change?

Recently I mentioned a number of reasons why males today may be cynical about marriage and family. With the marriage rate the lowest it's ever been in North America, some wonder if a men's marriage strike has begun, and some explicitly advocate this position. Sociologists have documented the positive effects seen in the lives of married males, but these effects appear to be waning.

In Britain, fathers' rights groups have begun acts of civil disobedience as they'd found other methods of protest ineffective. (Even though their protest methods are non-violent, they note that the women's suffrage movement gained prominence only after resorting to violence).

At the moment, men seem to be "acting" by not acting, while women feel the results. An article from the Chronicle of Higher Education entitled A Tough Time to Be a Girl suggests that the gender balance on campus has women becoming promiscuous in an attempt to attract the relatively few men available. At the same time, this has left them unable to trust those men that they know. With such changes, cheesy pickup lines may be going the way of the dodo bird:

While the male-female imbalance in the church is yet another topic of discussion, the discontent amongst single Christian women who desire to marry was sufficient to inspire an article in the Wall Street Journal under the title A Match Made on Earth: When Christians date outside the fold.. Even where Christian women do find men in the church, they're often left unimpressed:

In recent conversations with a couple of my girlfriends, I expressed an extreme disinterest in Christian guys of my generation.

"I've pretty much had it with Christian guys," I said. "The main problem is that they are 'guys' for too long and never become men."

They are, I theorized, stuck in the youth group culture. The church has encouraged them to never leave that mentality, and so it takes until about age 35 for them to extract themselves into adulthood-land where the women have been waiting for years and have been steadily growing fed up.

While men and women may now individually be feeling the pain of the present turmoil regarding marriage and family, the environment and civilization are also feeling the impact. As the British Sunday Times notes, divorce (and correspondingly singleness) may be seen as a contributor to environmental problems such as global warming. While the article contains more detail, in short, married households have a higher population density, and the economy of scale results also in more efficient use of resources inside the home.

Civilization is threatened by a lack of children being born. As Philip Longman notes in his book entitled The Empty Cradle: How falling birthrates threaten world prosperity and what to do about it, calculations about the sort of social programs to be implemented were based on an expanding population as well as productivity gains that haven't been met in reality. Medical advances have allowed for longer lives, but often have not greatly extended the work that people are able to do prior to retirement. Many western countries now are dependant on an influx of immigrants, but this is only a short-term solution (and a long, complicated argument in and of itself).

Wow! Seems like a rather gloomy picture for all concern. For now, consider the words of the (then unmarried cynic, now married) John Frame from his sermon Marriage as Unjust Unsuffering:

The Bible, of course, has a very positive view of marriage, but it is also realistic. It recognizes that in a sinful world there are a lot of problems in marriage. So while it says many positive things about marriage, it says some negative things as well. Once, indeed, Jesus told his disciples, in effect, “You’re not allowed to get divorced, so some of you shouldn’t get married at all.” In this sinful world there is a downside to marriage, and we ought to ask if we can accept that downside before we presume to make a lifetime commitment.

While meditating, stay tuned. Hopefully next time I'll get around to talking about solutions that some have proposed. Maybe something positive for once.

Cynicism about marriage and family (Part 1): a recipe for males

Start off with society's treatment of men as predators, as documented in two Wall Street Journal articles: Are We Teaching Our Kids To Be Fearful of Men? and Avoiding Kids: How Men Cope With Being Cast as Predators.

Mix in the problems of easy, no-fault divorce and add a dash of anti-father bias in divorce courts. In addition the vast majority of divorces are initiated by women. (It's worst amongst college-educated couples wherein 90% of divorces are initiated by women).

All the above factors in even before you begin to account for the additional wrench thrown in the works by the sexual revolution of the 1960s as well as the legalization of abortion.

Some of the risk factors can be controlled for in choosing a spouse. For example, nominal Christians divorce at a higher rate than the general population whereas those committed to a church divorce at a significantly lower rate [source].

Other risk factors can't be controlled for in a similar fashion. Unlike divorce laws which grant each spouse the ability to destroy the other's life, current child "protection" law allows anyone in society to interfere in any family for little or no reason (while the complainant is often left anonymous).

To follow: Cynicism about marriage and family (Part 2): a recipe for change?

Spinach: trash or treasure?

One of the vegetables I most detested when growing up was spinach, particularly since I typically encountered it as a slimy cooked blob with little zest.

Over time I've come to appreciate spinach in salad form. When Safeway had a (now-discontinued I think) sandwich that combined spinach, roasted red pepper, chicken and a few other ingredients, that was sufficient to lure me there over Subway or Quiznos.

A recipe for a spinach-lamb curry that I encountered a few days back has me wondering whether it's possible to perform a minor miracle: the transformation of a block of frozen green stuff into something tasty. (This is also a way to kill two birds with one stone, although I may also have to try making lamb spaghetti as well).

Unlike the spinach of my youth, which was lacking in pizzazz, I wonder if I'll be encountering the opposite problem here. Looking at the list of spices involved, I wonder if I'd get much the same effect on my tastebuds by shooting a flamethrower in my mouth. Ah well, if such is the case I may just wind up eating it with lots and lots of rice rather than just with rice.

Pages

Subscribe to Rotundus.com RSS