"I Was There. Just Ask Photoshop."

The New York Times had a great article a few days back entitled I Was There. Just Ask Photoshop.. Call me a luddite, but I don't care for much for modifying photos beyond basic lighting and cropping. I wonder if in years to come people will begin to regret prior photoshopping of their lives.

Admittedly cosmetics have been around thousands of years, with archeological evidence of them found amidst ancient Egyptian ruins. Yet photoshop and the like seem to take things a lot further than cosmetics ever have. With cosmetics you can resemble how "you" look in a photo, but even invasive cosmetic surgery can't duplicate all that you can do to a picture of yourself in photoshop.

The more change possible, the more people seem to be dissatisfied with how they look. In the twentieth century the results seem to be widespread eating disorders and depression. Add in the 67% of women who find annoying those 3,276 hours that the average woman spends over the course of a lifetime getting ready for a night out annoying.

Photoshop also results in a loss of history - the focus of the New York Times article. How did you look when growing up? Is that photo real or fake? Who is the "real you"?

Your favourite way to eat lamb or squid?

So, apparently I should cook up some lamb and follow that with a little bit of squid.

I could cook up a roast leg of lamb or deep fry some calimari, but I'm wondering what other options are around.

How would you prepare them?

Modern "art"

What can I say?

From the BBC: A giant inflatable dog turd brought down a power line after being blown away from a Swiss museum.

The artwork, entitled Complex Shit, was carried 200 metres on the night of 31 July, reportedly breaking a greenhouse window before it landed again.

Induction - cooking not math

Thus far my exposure to induction has been of the mathematical variety but I'm wondering if I should also move to cooking by induction.

Pros:

  • More available wattage than found in regular hotplates. Regular hotplates seem to top off at about 1200W, although I'm stuck with 900W for the larger burner at the moment. A typical electric stove has burners in the 1800W to 2500W range.)
  • Better efficiency. Less heat transfer to the surroundings (potentially close to 2x the efficiency, depending on who's figures your believe).
  • Quicker Startup. No need to wait for a burner to warm up prior to heating the pan.
  • Safety - since it requires the precense of metal to heat anything you could place your hand on the burner while it's on full-blast without injuring yourself.

Cons:

A good idea or not? You tell me!

Pages

Subscribe to Rotundus.com RSS