That's been one of the questions stuck in my mind since reading this article, which looks at projections for this year's salmon runs in BC:
Projections from throughout the ocean and fisheries science venues are advising that this years Fraser River Sockeye Salmon runs will be the all time historic high, twice the previous record of 1900. ... The Fraser River sockeye projection is in line with other stunning returns of salmon that coincide with the work to restore their ocean pasture which was successfully accomplished in the summer of 2012. Last falls record runs and catch of Pink Salmon from Alaska south where instead of the expected 50 million fish being caught in SE Alaska 226 million Pinks were caught clearly perfectly fits with the restoration of plankton abundance in the offshore salmon pastures we carried out in 2012.
Not only does this seem to mean more sustainable seafood - "traditional" fish farming has both nutrional issues and negative environmental effects - but the plankton blooms which have been decreasing over the last decades also have significant environmental implications. Not only has the aim of ocean fertilization efforts been to increase seafood availability but also to act as a carbon sink with potential effects as described in a previous experiment:
Smetacek’s experiment was a success. For two weeks, he was able to induce carbon to fall to the sea floor at the highest rate ever observed – some 34 times faster than normal.
It seems worth noting that as is the oceans suck up significantly more CO2 than the planet's forests. It seems interesting to me some of the opposition to this move, despite it operating in a much more controlled fashion than the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico resulting from excess nitrogen due to comparatively uncontrolled agricultural runoff and such things as the construction of dams limiting downstream fertility being not all that controversial at this point.